The safety model arrivesalready built.
Most platforms hand you an empty form and a year of setup. eAviora ships the bow-tie models, the barriers, the scenarios and the safety indicators on day one — so your team rates real risk and signs off real findings from the first report, instead of building the library first.
A whole risk library.
Nothing to build first.
One bow-tie per risk family, with preventive barriers on the left and recovery barriers on the right of every top event — the model an airline normally spends a year drawing. It is there before your first occurrence is filed.
210 operational scenarios sit underneath the families, each tied to the barriers that should catch it. You switch on the indicators that match your operation and adjust the rest — you are tuning a working model, not starting from a blank page.
The library learns
from every event.
Each occurrence rates the barriers it touched, feeds the risk profile, and structures the investigation. The model stops being a poster and becomes a live read of your operation.
- Rate every barrier on the record in front of you.
Each bow-tie barrier carries a strength on the occurrence it touched — strong, weakened or breached. The picture of what held and what failed builds itself from real events, not a once-a-year workshop.
- A Safety Risk Profile that computes itself.
Severity and likelihood are scored against your taxonomy, ICAO-aligned. The profile rolls up from live occurrences for every area you operate — no analyst re-keying a board pack the night before the meeting.
- Pick the method; the platform structures the investigation.
Five Whys, HFACS, the Reason model, Fishbone, TapRoot, Tripod Beta, Barrier Analysis and more are built in. Contributing factors are real records, barriers are real links, findings inherit owner, due date and the route to a corrective action.
The rules are enforced.
Not just written down.
An auditor wants to see that closure means something. Here it does — the platform will not let a finding close, or a board seal a record, until the work is genuinely done.
- A finding cannot close until its actions are verified.
Closure is gated on a completed effectiveness check — owner and verifier are never the same person. There is no manual override that quietly marks a finding done.
- The Safety Action Group and Review Board sit in the workflow.
SAG and SRB are stages with their own sign-off, not a meeting that happens beside the system. A board-sealed record stays governance-closed — reopening it leaves a trail.
- Every change is written down.
Who classified it, who rated the risk, who signed it off and when — recorded against the record. The audit trail is the by-product of doing the work, not a separate export.
Fair on the person.
Closed with the crew.
People only report when reporting is safe. A structured just-culture call and a visible feedback loop are part of the workflow — not a value on a poster.
- A just-culture decision, on the record.
Human error, at-risk behaviour or a deliberate violation is decided through a structured set of questions — the same fair test every time, with the reasoning written down beside the outcome.
- The reporter hears what changed.
Feedback to the reporter closes the loop, and safety promotion turns what you learned into a brief the whole operation sees — so the next person knows reporting led somewhere.
SMS doesn't live
in a silo.
A finding raised here flows into the rest of your safety system without an integration project. Four connections that matter on Monday morning.
See the library.
Rate a real barrier.
Walk a report from intake through the bow-tie, the risk profile and the effectiveness gate — on your data shape, with the founder, in 30 minutes.