Skip to content
eAviora
TAXONOMY SPINE15·101·210·245OK
BOW-TIE MODELS101OK
NAMED BARRIERS804OK
SAFETY INDICATORS610OK
IOSA ISARPS924OK
AGENT FLEET54NOMINAL
OPERATIONAL GRAPHONE OPERATIONLIVE
Aviation safety intelligence · live operational graph

we don't manage safety.we prevent incidents.

eAviora is the operating intelligence system for aviation safety, quality and compliance. It ships the risk model, connects every record on one operational graph, and runs human-gated AI you can audit three years later.

Ships in the box
101bow-tie models
804named barriers
610safety indicators
924IOSA ISARPs
The category was mislabeled

Most safety platforms are filing cabinets pretending to be software.

You logged occurrences, filed hazards, exported reports, and hoped the pattern surfaced before the accident did. That is record-keeping. The job was never to manage safety. It was to prevent the next incident.

You hear about precursors once they are already incidents.
The pattern was in your data months ago. Nobody had time to find it, so the regulator found it first.
Your audit trail lives in seven systems and a folder.
The auditor asks once; your team works the weekend reassembling a story that should already be one record.
Your AI answers differently every time you ask.
A different severity on Friday than Monday, a reclassification you cannot reproduce. Confidence without a trail is theatre.
The model ships in the box

You don't start from a blank bow-tie.

Legacy tools hand you an empty bow-tie and a blank indicator spreadsheet. eAviora hands you the model. Every occurrence snaps onto a bow-tie family with named barriers, activated against your operation, not authored from zero. When a record lands, the barrier fires while there is still time.

101
Bow-tie models
1,727
Risk elements
804
Named barriers
210
Operational scenarios
15
Risk themes
610
Indicator definitions
Occurrence
OCC-2026-0042
Precursor
Unstable approach ×3
Bow-tie
Runway excursion
Barrier
Stabilised-approach gate
BARRIER HOLDING · corrective action opened · verifier owner
ICAO 4-LEVEL
Tolerable
ACCEPTABLE · TOLERABLE · UNDESIRABLE · INTOLERABLE
CONTROL CHART · WESTERN ELECTRIC
Base riskTrendBarrier healthActive signalsCAPA exposureData confidenceSurveillanceAudit load
Are we getting safer?

A risk profile the system computes.

Eight named components fused into one ICAO four-level answer per risk theme, snapshotted and version-aware so the board reads a saved answer, not a live recalculation. Not a coloured trend bar. A number you can defend in a board room, and reproduce three years later.

One record, enforced closure

One record. Three sources of truth.

The reporter writes the narrative. The system adds weather, position and fleet. eAvy proposes the ICAO category and risk band. Every value carries a source and a confidence. Nothing is silently overwritten, and a record cannot close until barriers are assessed, every covering action is proven effective, and a second person signs.

OCC-2026-0042CLASSIFIED · LOCKED
Reporter narrative
Crew reported unusual vibration on approach, ILS RWY 25L. Stabilised at 1500ft AGL, monitored to touchdown, no further anomaly.
METAR at occurrenceSYS
VOMM 141330Z 28015KT 9999 FEW020 34/22 Q1008
ICAO classificationAI · 94%
Aircraft upset / Loss of control, in-flight (LOC-I)
Risk bandAI · 88%
4C · Tolerable, monitor
Your first officer

AI proposes. Humans approve.

A copilot that reads your records, drafts the next step, and never bypasses sign-off. You stay in command.

More than 50 specialist agents across five categories: classification, assessment, generation, validation and extraction.

Every suggestion is confidence-scored, constrained to your taxonomy, and cites the source records behind it. It picks from your lists, it never invents.

Each one arrives as a one-click approval. AI and the API can never set governance state, and confidential reports stay invisible to anyone not cleared for them.

From report to closure

One report. Thirty days. Audit-ready.

DAY 0 · 08:14 UTC
A crew submits a report.
A reporter writes the narrative, the only manual step. Just-Culture status is set the moment the form opens.
DAY 0 · 08:14 UTC
Classified, linked, locked.
The classifier picks an ICAO category from your taxonomy, links two similar reports from last quarter, and locks the analysis. Reference OCC-2026-0042.
DAY 1 · 07:00 UTC
It routes to the right post-holder.
Notification routes by rule, not by who happened to be on the email thread. The acknowledgement clock starts.
DAY 3 · 14:00 UTC
A corrective action opens, with an effectiveness gate.
Owner, verifier, due date. The plan links up to the report and down to a training competency that needs refreshing.
DAY 30 · 11:20 UTC
Effectiveness verified. The record closes.
Owner is not verifier, enforced by the workflow. Sign-off is recorded, and a de-identified safety bulletin drafts itself for review.
One graph, resolving into structure

Five operating suites.
Nine shared capabilities.

Not twelve equal apps. One operational graph organizes into five domain operating systems and nine platform services every team consumes.

01Safety ManagementSMS
02Quality & AssuranceQMS
03Security ManagementSeMS
04Compliance & RegulatoryCMP · REG
05Enterprise ReadinessDMS · TRG · OUT · PTR
Nine shared platform capabilities
Action CenterEvidence HubDocument ControlTraining & CompetenceAI ReviewOperational GraphNotifications & EscalationsTaxonomyAudit Trail

Benchmark-safe by design.

Taxonomy codes, indicator definitions and metric identifiers are immutable and version-pinned. Airlines map their local terms to the canonical layer, they never edit it. So the same occurrence classifies the same way this year and three years from now, and honest cross-airline benchmarking becomes possible.

Open by design

Reachable by your systems. And by an AI assistant.

The connected operation, open to your stack and to a copilot, built to pass an IT review, not to lock you in.

A documented, versioned REST API your flight-ops, FDM and HR systems can read and write.

An MCP connector so an AI assistant can query your safety picture in plain language, tenant-isolated and audited.

Signed webhooks, SAML single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, passkeys and multi-factor.

Tenant isolation enforced in the database itself, not app-code filtering. Canadian data residency.

Design partner cohort · open

Stop reacting. Start preventing.

Your data never trains a model.Tenant data is not used to improve our AI for anyone else. Ever.
No advertising trackers.No analytics pixels, no session replay on the platform.
Export on demand. No lock-in.Request a full export at any time. Yours is yours.