Skip to content
OUTSOURCING MANAGEMENTCODEOUT

Someone else does the work.You still own the outcome.

Maintenance, ground handling, training partners — kept under structural oversight. Service levels are tracked against actuals, and drift surfaces as a finding. The accountable manager still signs the close-out, regardless of who performed the activity.

PROVIDER OVERSIGHTSAMPLE
Menzies Aviation · MADGround handling · A320 fleet
OUT-2026-0042
  • Turn timetgt 35 min
    38 min+3 min
  • Damage incidentstgt 0 / month
    1over
  • Open findingstgt 0
    2open
  • Compliance scoretgt 95%
    92%−3 pts
  • Training currencytgt 100%
    100%on tgt
PROVIDERMenzies · MAD Signed
OPERATIONSGround Ops lead Signed
ACCOUNTABLEAM sign-offPending
01ONE OPERATIONAL PICTURE

Provider to sign-off.
One connected chain.

The work is outsourced; the accountability is not. Provider, activity, finding, corrective action and the accountable-manager sign-off all sit on the same picture — not five spreadsheets that have to agree.

  1. 01OUT
    ProviderMenzies Aviation · ground handling, A320 fleet
    OUT-2026-0042
  2. 02OUT
    ActivityTurn time tracked against the agreed service level
    OUT-2026-0042
  3. 03QMS
    FindingDrift over target — raised on the provider record
    FND-2026-0091
  4. 04CAP
    Corrective actionProvider owns the fix · your team verifies
    CAP-2026-0118
  5. 05OUT
    AM sign-offThe accountable manager closes the loop
    OUT-2026-0042
02FIVE MOMENTS THE PLATFORM ANSWERS FOR

Five moments.
No side spreadsheet.

  • When you bring on a provider.
    The activity, the agreement and the owner — on one record.

    A new ground handler, a maintenance contract, a training partner. Each becomes a provider record with its outsourced activity, its agreed service levels and its contract reference. The accountable manager is named at the start, not after the first audit finding.

  • When performance drifts.
    Drift surfaces as a finding, with an owner and a clock.

    Turn time creeps over target, an incident lands, an audit point stays open. The platform raises it as a finding against the provider and routes it through the same severity ladder as your own findings — so it is on the record before the next contract review, not after.

  • When a provider needs auditing.
    The same checklists, the same finding model.

    A provider audit runs on the same audit plan, finding model and evidence rules as your internal quality audits. There is no separate provider audit programme to keep in step — the findings land in the same operational picture.

  • When a finding needs closing.
    A corrective action the provider owns and you verify.

    A finding against a provider opens a corrective action. The provider owns the fix; your team verifies it. The same effectiveness gate applies — a corrective action cannot be marked done until the evidence shows it actually worked.

  • When the regulator asks who is accountable.
    The signature chain is already on the record.

    Provider sign-off, operations sign-off, accountable-manager sign-off — the chain is part of the close-out, not a folder of approval emails. The accountable manager is the last signature, regardless of who performed the activity.

OUT · ACCOUNTABILITY THAT SURVIVES AN AUDIT

Open the platform.
Run a provider review.

Walk through a service-level read, a drift finding and the accountable-manager sign-off — with the founder, on your contract shape, in 30 minutes.